Figma Sites turns your Figma designs into live, published websites — no separate builder, no code export, no developer handoff. Design in Figma, publish to the web. It's the logical extension of Figma's "everything in one tool" philosophy: if you can design in Figma, why can't you ship from Figma?

The reality is more nuanced than the promise. Figma Sites works excellently for specific use cases and falls short for others. Understanding the boundaries before you build saves frustration and ensures you choose the right tool for your specific project.

Key Takeaway

Figma Sites excels at landing pages, portfolios, and marketing pages — static or semi-static content that needs to look exactly like the Figma design with zero translation loss. It's not ready for web apps, e-commerce, content-heavy blogs, or anything requiring a CMS, user authentication, or complex interactions. Think of it as a pixel-perfect design-to-web pipeline, not a Webflow replacement.

What Figma Sites Does Well

Use Case Why It Works Time Saved vs Traditional
Landing pagesDesign IS the website — zero translation lossDays → hours
Designer portfoliosTotal pixel control, no theme constraintsSignificant (no template fighting)
Marketing/campaign pagesFast launch, polished result, team collaborationEliminates design→dev→review cycle
Event pagesQuick setup, easy updates, visual-firstHours → minutes for updates
Product announcement pagesMatch brand exactly, iterate fastSame-day publish from design

The common thread: static or semi-static content where visual fidelity matters more than dynamic functionality. For these use cases, Figma Sites eliminates the entire design-to-development pipeline. The designer IS the publisher. No handoff, no interpretation, no "this looks different from the mockup" conversations.

What Figma Sites Cannot Do (Yet)

Need Why Sites Falls Short Use Instead
Dynamic content (blogs, catalogs)No CMS or database integrationWebflow, WordPress, Next.js
E-commerceNo cart, checkout, or payment integrationShopify, Webflow + Stripe
User authenticationNo login/signup functionalityAny web framework
Complex interactionsNo JavaScript logic, no conditional renderingReact, Next.js, Framer
SEO-heavy sitesLimited meta tag control, no SSR, no sitemapNext.js, WordPress
Forms with backendNo form processing or data storageWebflow, custom build

For full-featured websites, you're still better off with a dedicated builder (Webflow, Framer, Next.js) or using Claude Code to build from your Figma designs via the MCP server. Figma Sites fills the gap between "I need a quick page" and "I need a full website" — and for that specific gap, it's the best tool available because it eliminates the design-to-code translation entirely.

📬 Getting value from this?

One actionable AI insight per week. Plus a free prompt pack when you subscribe.

Subscribe free →

Figma Sites vs Webflow vs Framer: Which Website Builder Should You Use?

Feature Figma Sites Webflow Framer
Design workflowDesign in Figma → publishRedesign in WebflowImport from Figma + edit
CMSNoYes (built-in)Yes (built-in)
Custom codeNoYesYes
AnimationBasicAdvancedAdvanced
SEOBasicAdvancedGood
Best forLanding pages from FigmaMarketing sites with CMSPortfolio + marketing sites
PriceIncluded with Figma$14-39/mo$5-30/mo

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Figma Sites included in my Figma subscription?

Basic publishing is included with paid plans. Custom domains and advanced publishing features may have additional costs. Check Figma's current pricing for Sites-specific tiers — this is evolving as the feature develops.

Can I use my own domain with Figma Sites?

Yes — Figma Sites supports custom domain connections. You can publish to yourdomain.com instead of the default Figma-hosted URL, making it suitable for professional use.

How does Figma Sites SEO compare to a regular website?

Limited. Figma Sites generates client-rendered pages with basic meta tag support. For content sites that depend on SEO (blogs, documentation, product pages), a framework with server-side rendering (Next.js, Astro) or a dedicated builder (Webflow) produces better search performance. For landing pages where SEO is less critical (paid traffic destinations, event pages), Figma Sites is adequate.

Should I use Figma Sites for my portfolio?

If you're a designer who wants total visual control with zero coding: yes. Your Figma design skill directly translates to website quality — no template constraints, no compromises. The main limitation is no blog/CMS, so you can't easily add written case studies that update dynamically. If your portfolio is visual-first with static content, Figma Sites is excellent.

Will Figma Sites get CMS and dynamic content?

Likely — Figma has indicated plans to expand Sites' capabilities. But timeline is unclear. Don't choose Figma Sites based on features that don't exist yet. Evaluate it on what it does today, and switch tools when your needs exceed its current capabilities.

Disclosure: Some links in this article are affiliate links. We only recommend tools we've personally tested and use regularly. See our full disclosure policy.